| 拒不执行判决、裁定罪之追诉程序探讨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈国坤,叶献军.拒不执行判决、裁定罪之追诉程序探讨[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2007,1(5):84-86. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈国坤 叶献军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 南通大学,法政学院,江苏,南通,226019
2. 建德市人民法院,浙江,建德,311600 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 造成人民法院已生效的法律文书"执行难"的根本原因在于对本罪追诉程序的启动上往往单纯依靠某一种追诉模式,未能将自诉程序和公诉程序的各自优点结合起来,以实现优势互补.在实践中还应该考虑打通二者之间的适用壁垒,实现双向的合理转化,以便于有效打击犯罪,节约司法资源的,提高司法效率,保证程序公正.
|
| 关 键 词： | 拒不执行判决、裁定罪 追诉程序 立法完善 执行判决 定罪 追诉 程序公正 Procedure 司法效率 司法资源 节约 打击犯罪 转化 实践 互补 优势 结合 公诉 自诉程序 模式 依靠 启动 本罪 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7966(2007)05-0084-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年7月9日 |
Investigation into Prosecution Procedure about Crime of Refusing to Execute Judgments or Orders |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Guo-kun YE Xian-jun |
| |
| Abstract: | The prime cause of carrying out the legal document with legal validity of the people's court difficultly is the starting of the retrospect crime procedure with only one retroactive pattern and not mixing the respective advantages of the private prosecution procedure and the appeal procedure to exploit complementary advantages.In practice,there is a great need for creating a connection between the two procedures to get through the barrier to realize the bidirectional reasonable transformation to make sure that this kind of crime can be attacked effectively,to ensure the realization of effective utilization and saving of judicature resources and enhancing the judicial efficiency and the investigation of the procedure plays fair. |
| |
| Keywords: | crime of refusing to execute judgments or orders prosecution procedure complete legislation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
