首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

形式解释论与实质解释论:事实与理念之展开
引用本文:陈兴良.形式解释论与实质解释论:事实与理念之展开[J].法制与社会发展,2011(2).
作者姓名:陈兴良
作者单位:北京大学法学院;
摘    要:我国目前的刑事司法实践完全没有深深陷入法律形式主义的泥坑,因而需要采用实质解释论加以拯救,而恰恰是深深陷入了法律实质主义的泥坑,由此逾越了罪刑法定原则的樊篱,因而需要引入形式解释论加以纠正。在某种意义上,形式解释论与实质解释论之争不仅是构成要件论之争,甚至是刑法机能论之争、刑法观之争。在我国当下社会中,法治规则意识尚未完全建立。在这种前法治时代,我国应该大力弘扬规则功利主义。

关 键 词:法律形式主义  法律实质主义  形式解释论  实质解释论  规则功利主义  

Interpretation on Form and Interpretation on Substance:Expounding by Facts and Notion
CHEN Xing-liang.Interpretation on Form and Interpretation on Substance:Expounding by Facts and Notion[J].Law and Social Development,2011(2).
Authors:CHEN Xing-liang
Institution:CHEN Xing-liang(Law School,Peking University,Beijing,100871)
Abstract:At the present stage,criminal judicial practice is not in the morass of legal formalism and need to be saved by interpretation on substance,but on the contrary,in the morass of legal substantialism,goes beyond the principle of crime and punishment by law,and need to be saved by interpretation on form.It can be seen that the controversial between interpretation on form and interpretation on substance is not a debate on composing factors of crime,but rather the debate on the function and view of criminal law....
Keywords:legal formalism  legal substantialism  interpretation on form  interpretation on substance  normative utilitarianism  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号