| 胎儿人身利益保护的法理思考--兼论胎儿在我国未来民法典中的民事主体地位 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杨芳,姜柏生,潘荣华.胎儿人身利益保护的法理思考--兼论胎儿在我国未来民法典中的民事主体地位[J].法律与医学杂志,2004,11(3):170-174. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杨芳 姜柏生 潘荣华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 杨芳（安徽医科大学人文学院法学系,合肥,230032）;姜柏生（南京医科大学医政学院,290021）;潘荣华（安徽医科大学人文学院法学系,合肥,230032） |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文是2003年度国家社科基金项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 胎儿没有民事权利能力,其人身利益一旦受到侵害,无法以民事主体身份获得法律保护.文章结合案例和学者观点,检讨了传统法律人格的缺陷,借鉴了国外及我国台湾地区胎儿保护的立法经验,认为未来民事立法应当赋予胎儿一定的民事主体地位.
|
| 关 键 词： | 胎儿 民事权利能力 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-9297(2004)03-0170-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年12月29 |
A jurisprudential study on how to protect embryo's personal interest law analysis of civil legal status of unborn child |
| |
| YANG Fang JIANG Bai-sheng,PAN Rong-hua. Social Science.A jurisprudential study on how to protect embryo''''s personal interest law analysis of civil legal status of unborn child[J].The Journal of Law & Medicine,2004,11(3):170-174. |
| |
| Authors: | YANG Fang JIANG Bai-sheng PAN Rong-hua Social Science |
| |
| Institution: | YANG Fang JIANG Bai-sheng,PAN Rong-hua. Social Science Department,Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230032,China |
| |
| Abstract: | In civil law an unborn child has no the capacity for private right. Once an embryo's personal interest is violated, it can't be protected as a civil party. This article discusses the shortcomings of traditional systems on birth. Studying the experience of legislation of western countries and Taiwan, it argued that embryo's capacity for private rights must be defined in China to protect the unborn children's interest. |
| |
| Keywords: | Embryo Capacity for private right |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
