| 承租人优先购买权的法律救济方式——评《合同法》230条的矛盾性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 关宁.承租人优先购买权的法律救济方式——评《合同法》230条的矛盾性[J].贵州警官职业学院学报,2010,22(1):70-76. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 关宁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆大学法学院,重庆,400045 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《中华人民共和国合同法》第230条所规定的承租人优先购买权并未明确救济方式，从逻辑上分析，存在3种救济方式。这3种救济方式有存在的理论根据、优点及不足，并且其也代表了承租人优先购买权的3种性质。房屋承租人优先购买权无论如何定性。在理论上及实务上均存在矛盾。
|
| 关 键 词： | 承租人优先购买权 法律救济 矛盾性 |
Legal Redress Ways of Priority to Purchase of Renter——Comment on Contradiction of Article 230 of Contract Law |
| |
| GUAN Ning.Legal Redress Ways of Priority to Purchase of Renter——Comment on Contradiction of Article 230 of Contract Law[J].Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College,2010,22(1):70-76. |
| |
| Authors: | GUAN Ning |
| |
| Institution: | GUAN Ning (Law College of Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, P.R.China) |
| |
| Abstract: | According to Article 230 of Contract Law of the People＇s Republic of China, the priority to purchase of renter has not defined the, redress wayS. Logically analyzed there are three redress ways. The three redress ways have their theorelieal basis of exisienee, advantage and disadvantage, and represent the three characteristics of the priority to purchase of relater, whenever how to define the priority, to purchase of renter, there are contradictions between theory and practice. |
| |
| Keywords: | the priority to purchase Of renter legal redress contradictions |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
