首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国《反垄断法》修订的几点思考
引用本文:王晓晔.我国《反垄断法》修订的几点思考[J].法学评论,2020(2):11-21.
作者姓名:王晓晔
作者单位:深圳大学
摘    要:我国反垄断执法十一年来取得了巨大成就,执法经验和能力较执法初期有了很大提高。随着反垄断执法的常态化和深入发展,今天反垄断法部分条款已经不能完全适应现在和未来的需要。另一方面,随着竞争政策在我国资源配置中越来越起着决定性作用,与反垄断立法时候的政策环境相比,竞争政策在今天已经成为我国基本经济政策,产业政策与之相比退到了次要地位。这些情况说明,我国现在有必要修订反垄断法。修订反垄断法应当强化竞争政策在这部法律中的地位,修订中应优先考虑执法中迫切需要解决的问题。另一方面,法律修订虽然应当与时俱进,但要避免把国际上尚未普遍接受的条款急于纳入反垄断法,有些条款的修订还应当考虑我国经济体制改革进程和执法机关的现状。

关 键 词:反垄断法修订  竞争政策  反垄断实体法  反垄断程序法

Some Reflections on Anti-Monopoly Law Amendment in China
WANG Xiaoye.Some Reflections on Anti-Monopoly Law Amendment in China[J].Law Review,2020(2):11-21.
Authors:WANG Xiaoye
Abstract:China’s Anti-Monopoly Law(AML)enforcement has made great achievements in the past 11 years.With the in-depth development of AML enforcement,some of provisions of the AML have not been meet with the demand of the present and the future.On the other hand,with competition policy playing a more and more decisive role in the allocation of resources,it shows that compared with the policy environment in the duration of the AML legislation,competition policy has become the basic economic policy of our country,and the industrial policy has been relegated to a secondary position.These facts show that it is necessary to revise the AML today.The revision of the AML should strengthen the position of competition policy in this law,and should give priority to the urgent problems in the law enforcement.On the other hand,even though the revision should keep pace with the times,it should avoid incorporating the provisions that have not been universally accepted into the AML,and additionally,the revision must also take into account the process of China’s economic restructuring and the structure and resources of the enforcement agencies.
Keywords:Anti-Monopoly Law Amendment  Competition Policy  Anti-monopoly Substantive Law  Anti-monopoly Procedural Law
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号