我国物权法应采用物权行为理论--围绕《合同法》第51条之争议

通过对一则案例的分析提出问题,引出目前学界对《合同法》第51条规定所存在的争议观点,并 进而引出物权行为理论问题。然后,通过对中外学者对物权行为理论的态度的理解与认识.提出 我国物权法的制定应采用物权行为理论,方能解决围绕《合同法》第51条之争议。《合同法》对债 权合同的效力进行规定,而由物权法对物权行为的效力进行规定,从而达到物权法与《合同法》的 相互衔接,实现和谐统一。

China's Real Right Should Adopt the Theory on Juristic Act of Real Right--Enclosing the debate of article 51 of the contract law of PRC

Firstly, this article advances the issue through analyzing a case , and educes the debated idea of article 51 of the Contract Law of PRC existing in academic circles at present. Furthermore, introduces the theory on juristic act of real right. According to understanding and realizing the scholars attitude about the theory on juristic act of real right in China and foreign countries , the author raises that to make China ' s Real Right should adopt the theory on juristic act of real right. The effect of contract of obligation is provided for by the Coutract Law of PRC, and the effect of real right act is provided for by the Law of Real Right. In this way, it will make the two laws in harmony with each other.