行政审批与矿业权转让合同的效力

关于行政审批与矿业权转让合同效力的关系,存在绑定与区分两种技术路线,由此关于未经行政审批之矿业权转让合同的效力状态,存有＂合同无效说＂、＂合同未生效说＂和＂合同有效说＂三种不同的立场。基于合同效力与合同履行相分离的既定选择,国家管制矿业权变动应当从否定矿业权转让合同的效力转向控制矿业权的实际变动,也即未经行政审批的矿业权转让合同亦为有效合同。在政策选择上,应当采用行政审批与矿业权转让合同效力区分的立法政策;在技术构成上,可以利用违约责任的承担与免除机制调整当事各方的利益关系。

On the Relation Between Administrative Authorization and Effectiveness of Mineral Title Contracts

There are three different positions about the relationship between the administrative authorization and the effect of mineral title contracts： Valid contracts,Invalid contracts and Unexecutory contracts.Based on the separation technology of contracts＇ effectiveness and contracts＇ performance,the administrative authorization should be controlling the alteration of mineral rights,not controlling the effectiveness of mineral title contracts.That means the contracts are valid,even they did not get the administrative approval.On policy choice,we should distinguish the administrative authorization and the effectiveness of mineral title contract;On the technical composition,we can use the default liability mechanism to adjust the interests of the parties.