首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论连带责任分摊请求权——兼论不具有分摊能力连带责任人份额的再分配方案
引用本文:王竹. 论连带责任分摊请求权——兼论不具有分摊能力连带责任人份额的再分配方案[J]. 法律科学, 2010, 28(3): 135-144
作者姓名:王竹
作者单位:四川大学法学院,四川,成都,610051 
摘    要:
分摊请求权不同于追偿请求权,是与连带责任相对应的制度。大陆法系的分摊请求权较为体系化,英美法上的分摊请求权具有较强的衡平法色彩。对不具有分摊能力连带责压入份额的再分配方案,大陆法系采用“事后二次分担规则”,英美法系采用“事前二次分担规则”,《民法通则》未对该问题作出规定。分摊请求权的产生基础是矫正正义。我国侵权法上应采大陆法系“事后二次分担规则”。

关 键 词:分摊请求权  连带责任  衡平法  分摊不能份额  再分配

On the Right of Contribution in Joint and Several Liability: Also a Comment on the Mode of edistribution of the Share of Insolvent Jointly and Severally Liable Tortfeasor
WANG Zhu. On the Right of Contribution in Joint and Several Liability: Also a Comment on the Mode of edistribution of the Share of Insolvent Jointly and Severally Liable Tortfeasor[J]. Law Science (Journal of Northwest Institute University of Politics and Law), 2010, 28(3): 135-144
Authors:WANG Zhu
Abstract:
The right of contribution, corresponding to joint and several liability, is different trom the right of indemnification. The right of contribution in Civil Law System is relatively systematic, while it is more equitable in Anglo - Saxon Law System. For the mode of redistribution of the share of insolvent jointly and severally liable tortfeasor, Civil Law System adopts "post- redistribution rule", while the Anglo -Saxon Law adopts the pre -redistribution rule, which was not stipulated in The General Principles of Civil Law. The foundation of the right of contribution is corrective justice. Chinese Tort Law may follow the Civil Law tradition and adopt the post -redistribution rule.
Keywords:the right of contribution  joint and several liability  equity  uncontributable share  redistribution
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号