首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不起诉裁量权研究
引用本文:宋英辉,吴宏耀.不起诉裁量权研究[J].政法论坛,2000(5).
作者姓名:宋英辉  吴宏耀
作者单位:中国政法大学!北京,100088,中国政法大学!北京,100088
摘    要:不起诉裁量权是与起诉便宜主义密切相连的、法律特别授予或认可的检察官对于起诉与否的选择权。因而,各国在公诉问题上的基本立场直接影响着立法对检察机关不起诉裁量权的态度。我国立法有关酌定不起诉的规定,赋予了检察机关有限的不起诉裁量权,同时也意味着对起诉便宜主义积极价值的肯认。两大法系在此问题上存在不同作法,自有其不同原因,我国应采取有效措施,补正现行制度的缺陷,推动相关制度的进一步完善。

关 键 词:不起诉  裁量权  救济程序  制约

Study on Nol Pro Discretionary Right
Song Yinghui, Wu Hongyao.Study on Nol Pro Discretionary Right[J].Tribune of Political Science and Law,2000(5).
Authors:Song Yinghui  Wu Hongyao
Institution:Song Yinghui; Wu Hongyao
Abstract:Non pros Discretion is an option power authorized by the law and exercised by the prosecutor to determine whether to prosecute the suspect or not, relating closely to opportunism principle. Therefore, the basic position of every country on public prosecution directly influences the attitude of the legislation toward Non pros Discretion. Our country's legislation has granted the prosecutor limited Non pros Discretion, meaning the acceptance of the merit of opportunism principle. This article compares the different practice of the two main legal systems on this problem and the ran and tentatively resolves the problems we are facing.
Keywords:Non pros  discretion  relief procedure  check
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号