公司治理模式演化争论的法律思维根源

对全球公司制度的演化趋势,统一论与分化论的两种观点针锋相对。争论的根源在于论者法律思维的差异,并突出表现在现象与标准、法律与事实、宏观与微观、技术与社会等几对范畴上。立足于法律的本质并关注公司制度的选择问题,分化论有说服力;而统一论则因把法律问题简单技术化、混淆事实与规范选择的差异而有明显局限。因此,应当坚持理性的法律思维,坚持公司制度国际演化的"功能统一、形式分化"二元观。

The Origin of the Legal Thought Concerning the Debate on Corporation Governance Models

In the debate concerning the worldwide evolution tendency of corporation governance,"unificationism" and "differentiationism" are diametrically opposite.This paper holds that the controversy,stemming from difference of legal ideas,is prominent in certain dichotomous areas,such as phenomena and standard,law and fact,macrocosm and microcosm,technology and society,etc.In comparison,differentiationism is more convincing because it is based on the essence of law and concerns about the choice of company institutions while unificationism is obviously limited because it simply deems legal problems technical ones and confuses facts and choice of norms.We should have rational legal ideas and maintain the dualism of "functional unification and formal differentiation" in the international evolution of company institutions.