缺乏对抗的“被告人说话式”审判——对我国“控辩式”刑事审判的实证考察

我国立法机关于1996年在吸收了对抗式刑事审判合理因素的基础上,创设了"控辩式审判"方式,以解决庭审走过场的弊端和实现控辩审职能的分化。从司法实践来看,改革者的目标并没有得到实现。我国的刑事审判在实际运作上是一种缺乏对抗的"被告人说话式"审判,具体表现在:庭审上趋于消极但不中立的法官,公诉人对审判的单方面主导,被告人是法庭上的"主角","说话权"受限的量刑辩护人,法庭调查的书面化等。由此导致我国刑事审判制度的双高现象:高效率和高定罪率。

The Non-adversary Process with Only the Accused Argument:An Empirical Study of China's Prosecution and Defense in Criminal Trials

Based on the experience of foreign adversary procedure,a criminal trial system called prosecution and defense was set up in China in 1996 for the purpose of eradicating the defect of court trial as do it as a mere formality and separating the functions of the prosecution and the defense.However,from the perspective of judicial practice,one can do nothing but regretfully find the reformers' efforts a failure.In fact,China's present criminal trials are a sort of non-adversary procedure with only the accused a...