首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国食品安全法中的惩罚性赔偿之解读
引用本文:王吉林.我国食品安全法中的惩罚性赔偿之解读[J].天津市政法管理干部学院学报,2010,26(1):43-48.
作者姓名:王吉林
作者单位:天津科技大学,法政学院,天津,300222 
摘    要:“退一赔十”是对我国食品安全法所规定的惩罚性赔偿责任的误读。我国食品安全法中的惩罚性赔偿适用的基础法律关系是产品责任,客观要件是食品生产经营者的行为符合产品责任的构成要件,主观要件是食品生产经营者者具有故意。在食品生产经营者均具有故意之时,应对惩罚性赔偿承担连带责任。在侵权责任法实施后,应适时对食品安全法第96条进行修改,将赔偿数额修改为按补偿性赔偿的倍数进行赔偿。

关 键 词:产品责任  补偿性赔偿  惩罚性赔偿  故意

The Explanation of Punitive Damages in China's Food Safety Law
Institution:WANG Ji- lin (Law School, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300222, China)
Abstract:"Retreat one indemnity 10" is the misunderstanding of the punitive damages in China's food safety law. The foundation legal relationship of punitive damages in China's food safety law is the product liability, the objective element is that the acts of the food producers or traders apply to the composition of elements in line with product liability, the subjective element of the food producers or traders is that they have intention. In case that the food producers or traders have intention, they should bear the joint liabili- ty to punitive modify article compensatory damages. Once the Tort Law of the 96 of food safety law, and amend damages for compensation. People's Republic of China comes into force, we should the amount of compensation according to a multiple of
Keywords:product liability  compensatory damages  punitive damages  intention
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号