首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

检察官起诉裁量权的外部控制及其反思——以国际刑事诉讼为视角
引用本文:蒋娜.检察官起诉裁量权的外部控制及其反思——以国际刑事诉讼为视角[J].现代法学,2013,35(1):153-162.
作者姓名:蒋娜
作者单位:北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京,100875
基金项目:国家社科基金青年项目"国际刑事法治的发展趋势及对我国和平发展的影响研究"
摘    要:在国际刑事诉讼中,检察官起诉裁量权的外部控制不可或缺,而单纯的外部控制却凸显范围有限、效果不佳、成本高昂等局限与不足。与单纯的外部控制相比,内部控制具有主动性、自律性的特点,且这种内部监督和控制的限度还与国际刑事法治的境界相契合。在当前检察官的起诉裁量权广泛存在且业已渗入非缔约国司法领域的情况下,只有将基于内外因辩证关系原理指导下的双重控制有机结合起来,才能防范裁量权滥用,促进实现裁量正义,保证国际刑事诉讼中检察官裁量权的公正行使。

关 键 词:起诉裁量权  外部控制  内部控制  裁量权改革  监督制约

External Control over Prosecutorial Discretion:From the Angle of International Criminal Proceedings
JIANG Na.External Control over Prosecutorial Discretion:From the Angle of International Criminal Proceedings[J].Modern Law Science,2013,35(1):153-162.
Authors:JIANG Na
Institution:JIANG Na(College of Criminal Law Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
Abstract:In international criminal proceedings,even though external control over prosecutorial discretion is held indispensable,mere external control has betrayed not a few defects,such as limited coverage,low efficiency or high costs.Compared with pure external control,internal control,featured with initiative and selfdiscipline,is well consistent with practices of international criminal justice in terms of its bounds of supervision and control.Since prosecutorial discretion is now ubiquitous and has even been introduced into jurisdictions of non-parties to the Rome Statute,only by way of combining external and internal controls under dialectical principle,can we prevent the abuse of prosecutorial discretion and realize discretionary justice in international criminal proceedings.
Keywords:prosecutorial discretion  external control  internal control  reform of discretion  supervision and restriction
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号