Police-Induced Confessions,Risk Factors,and Recommendations: Looking Ahead |
| |
| Authors: | Saul M Kassin Steven A Drizin Thomas Grisso Gisli H Gudjonsson Richard A Leo Allison D Redlich |
| |
| Institution: | 1.John Jay College of Criminal Justice,New York,USA;2.Northwestern University School of Law and Center on Wrongful Convictions,Chicago,USA;3.University of Massachusetts Medical School,Worcester,USA;4.Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College,London,UK;5.University of San Francisco School of Law,San Francisco,USA;6.State University of New York at Albany,Albany,USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Reviewing the literature on police-induced confessions, we identified suspect characteristics and interrogation tactics that influence confessions and their effects on juries. We concluded with a call for the mandatory electronic recording of interrogations and a consideration of other possible reforms. The preceding commentaries make important substantive points that can lead us forward—on the effects of videotaping of interrogations on case dispositions; on the study of non-custodial methods, such as the controversial Mr. Big technique; and on an analysis of why confessions, once withdrawn, elicit such intractable responses compared to statements given by child and adult victims. Toward these ends, we hope that this issue provides a platform for future research aimed at improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ |
|
