首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

限制与扩张:我国证人资格制度之历史嬗变
引用本文:张友好.限制与扩张:我国证人资格制度之历史嬗变[J].西南政法大学学报,2006,8(3):128-135.
作者姓名:张友好
作者单位:四川大学法学院,四川,成都,610065
摘    要:除传统之“亲不为证”外,我国古代对证人资格殊少限制,只是到了唐代,才将证人自身之作证能力纳入到了证人适格的考察范围。近代以来,受认识深化和外来文化的影响,并基于政策性、可靠性、客观性和公正性等因素的考量,关于证人资格的规定变化很大,实现了从重在证人的适格性审查到证言的真实性审查、从单向容隐到同居相隐再到特权容隐、从道德义务到法律义务再到道德义务和法律权利的结合体等几个转变。

关 键 词:证人资格  亲不为证  演进规律
文章编号:1008-4355(2006)03-0128-08
修稿时间:2005年5月16日

Restriction and Relaxation: The History of Competence of a Witness in China
ZHANG You-hao.Restriction and Relaxation: The History of Competence of a Witness in China[J].Journal of Swupl,2006,8(3):128-135.
Authors:ZHANG You-hao
Abstract:In ancient China,rare restriction was imposed on the eligibility of a witness except for the traditional principle that "relatives were not qualified for giving testimony." Not until the Tang Dynasty did people began to consider the competence of witness while observing the propriety of a witness.Influenced by foreign culture and ripened cognition,and in consideration of relevant policies,reliability,objectivity and fairness,provisions concerning the competence of a witness in modern times have changed a great deal.The focal point has turned from the propriety of a witness to the authenticity of testimony,from the principle that family members may be allowed not to disclose information against each other to the principle that cohabitated members have the right not to turn informer against each other,then to the principle that some privileged persons may not testify about confidential communications,and from moral obligations to legal obligations,and then to the combination of legal rights and moral obligations.
Keywords:competence of witness  relatives were not eligible for witness  rules of evolution  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号