首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

从利用BBS犯罪分析网络内容服务商的不作为刑事责任
引用本文:叶琦.从利用BBS犯罪分析网络内容服务商的不作为刑事责任[J].公安理论与实践,2005,15(4):77-79.
作者姓名:叶琦
作者单位:华东政法学院 上海200042
摘    要:网络服务商包括网络连接服务商和网络内容服务商。网络连接服务商由于各种原因不能成为互联网中不作为犯罪的主体。从不作为犯罪的构成原理来看,网络内容服务商如BBS及其相关工作人员完全符合不作为犯罪的构成条件,并且其罪过形式只能是故意犯罪。然而,我国现行刑法却对这一犯罪主体及相关罪名没有明确规定,无疑会放纵此类危害甚大的犯罪。

关 键 词:网络服务商  网络连接服务商  网络内容服务商  不作为  刑事责任
文章编号:1008-5750(2005)04-0077-(04)
修稿时间:2005年4月6日

From Utilizing BBS Crime to Analyze the Nonfeasance Criminal Responsibility of Internet Content Provider
YE Qi.From Utilizing BBS Crime to Analyze the Nonfeasance Criminal Responsibility of Internet Content Provider[J].Journal of Shanghai Public Security Academy,2005,15(4):77-79.
Authors:YE Qi
Abstract:Internet Service Provider includes Internet Access Provider and Internet Content Provider. Because of various kinds of reasons, Internet Access Provider can't become the subject of nonfeasance crime in Internet. From the composition principle of nonfeasance crime, Internet Content Provider such as BBS and relevant staff members indeed accord with the composition terms of nonfeasance crime, and its fault form can only be the intentional crime. But the current criminal law of our country does not have clear regulation to this subject of crime and relevant charges, thus will undoubtedly indulge this great dangerous kind of crime.
Keywords:Internet Service Provider  Internet Access Provider  Internet Content Provider  Nonfeasance  Criminal Responsibility
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号