首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论假冒专利行为——对2008年《专利法》第63条的一点看法
引用本文:李国庆.论假冒专利行为——对2008年《专利法》第63条的一点看法[J].天津市政法管理干部学院学报,2011(1).
作者姓名:李国庆
作者单位:河南郑州中原工学院政法学院;
摘    要:2008年《专利法》第63条修改了原2000专利法关于假冒他人专利行为和冒充专利行为的规定,规定了假冒专利行为的法律责任。同2000年专利法相比,2008年《专利法》第63条有一定的优点,但假冒专利行为毕竞是一种损害公共利益的行为,它不应当承担民事责任,而应当承担行政责任和刑事责任,而且,专利法应当让实施假冒专利行为的违法者承担"没收非法财物"的行政责任。

关 键 词:假冒专利  冒充专利  行政处罚

On Acts of Counterfeiting Patent——Thoughts on the Article 63 of the Patent Law 2008
LI Guo-qing.On Acts of Counterfeiting Patent——Thoughts on the Article 63 of the Patent Law 2008[J].Journal of Tianjin Administrative Institute of Political Science & Law,2011(1).
Authors:LI Guo-qing
Institution:LI Guo-qing(Zhengzhou Zhongyuan Engineering College,Zhengzhou 450079,China)
Abstract:Article 63 of the Patent Law 2008 amended the regulations of acts of counterfeiting patent and bogus patent in the original Patent Law 2000 and provides legal liability for acts of counterfeiting patents.Compared with Patent Law 2000,there is certain advantage in Article 63 of the Patent Law 2008 but the act of counterfeiting patent is an act which is detrimental to the public interest,so it should not bear civil liability,but should assume the administrative responsibility and criminal liability.Moreover,P...
Keywords:counterfeiting patent  bogus patent  administrative penalty  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号