赠与合同三题

首先 ,《合同法》的颁布并未平息赠与合同究为诺成合同还是实践合同的争论。笔者认为 ,《合同法》第 186条第 1款所指的赠与仅有诺成合同之名 ,却有实践合同之实。与其如此 ,不如直接将其规定为实践合同。这样较符中国的国情 ,而有利于重合同守信用的观念和法律意识的培养和提高 ;该条第 2款所指的赠与显然具有诺成合同之特征。其次 ,该法第 189条关于赠与人损害赔偿之规定的适用范围有待明确。最后 ,受赠人是否应有行为能力之限制 ,则应区别对待。

Three Problems About Contracts For Donation

Firstly, the new Contract Law hasn't stopped the argument about whether contracts for donation are consensual contracts or real contracts. In the writer's opinion, contracts for donation referred to in Article 186, Section 1 have only got the name of consensual contracts, but has the reality of real contracts. Such being the case, it is better to simply define it as real contract, which is suitable to China's actual conditions. There is no doubt that contracts for donation referred to in Article 186, Section 2 are consensual contracts. Secondly, the sphere of application of the provisions about the donators' compensation for damage in Article 189 has yet to be defined. Lastly, the question whether a natural person without civil juristic act capacity can be donee of contracts for donation ought to be treated differently.