首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

合同诈骗罪“非法占有目的”之结构性认定
引用本文:樊华中,张红梅.合同诈骗罪“非法占有目的”之结构性认定[J].公安理论与实践,2011(6):59-69.
作者姓名:樊华中  张红梅
作者单位:[1]上海市奉贤区人民检察院,上海201400 [2]上海市闵行区人民检察院,上海201100
摘    要:从理论及实务经验来看,盗窃、诈骗等侵财类犯罪的“非法占有目的”一般由“排除意思”与“利用意思”两个方面构成。排除意思侧重排除权利人的法益保护,利用意思侧重财物的经济利用。合同诈骗作为诈骗的特殊形态,其非法占有目的也可以从此两结构进行认定。具体来说,从签订合同时、合同履行中判断其是否具有排除意思及利用意思,也可以从合同履行中履行完毕前对通过合同取得财物的利用方式判断其是否具有非法占有目的。

关 键 词:合同诈骗  非法占有  结构性认定  排除意思  利用意思

The Structural Confirmation of the Purposes of Illegal Possession of Contract Fraud
Fan Huazhong,Zhang Hongmei.The Structural Confirmation of the Purposes of Illegal Possession of Contract Fraud[J].Journal of Shanghai Public Security Academy,2011(6):59-69.
Authors:Fan Huazhong  Zhang Hongmei
Institution:(Shanghai People's Procuratorate of Fengxian District, Shanghai 201400, China ; Shanghai People' s Procuratorate of Minhang District, Shanghai 201100, China)
Abstract:From the theoretical and practical experience, "illegal possession of purpose" in theft, fraud and other crimes against property category construct by two aspects. As a special form of fraud, contract fraud, illegal possession of its purpose also can be identified from two structures. Specifically, we can judge whether the exclusion of its meaning and use of means from the signed contract. We can judge from the performance of using obtained property by way of contract to determine the purpose of illegal possession.
Keywords:Contract Fraud  Illegal Possession  Structural Confirmation  Exclusion  Use
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号