首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

1979-2019:当代中国刑事诉讼研究话语体系的兴起与转型
引用本文:左卫民,何胤霖. 1979-2019:当代中国刑事诉讼研究话语体系的兴起与转型[J]. 法学评论, 2020, 0(4): 181-196
作者姓名:左卫民  何胤霖
作者单位:四川大学法学院
摘    要:
基于对话语的考察,可以发现中国刑事诉讼法学研究在不同阶段有着不同的特质。在恢复发展之初,刑诉法学研究以"法政话语"为主导,呈现"弱学理性"的整体面貌;在中期阶段,学术话语成为主流,刑诉法学研究处于一个学理性的发展时期;晚近阶段,微观化、技术型的话语占据主导地位,学术研究进入了学理性的深化时期。在这种话语变迁之下,隐藏着刑诉理论研究功利主义以及研究方法有限性的问题。未来,研究者应当消除学术研究中的理想主义,生产出具有实践价值的知识产品,同时,注重对实证研究方法等的运用,进一步实现研究方法的多样性发展。

关 键 词:话语  刑事诉讼法学  功利主义

1979-2019:Rise and Transformation of Discourse System in Criminal Procedure Research in Contemporary China
Abstract:
Based on the research of the discourse,we can find that Chinese criminal procedure law research has different characteristics at different stages.At the beginning of the resumption of development,the study of criminal procedure law was dominated by"law and political discourse",showing the overall appearance of"weak academic".In the mid-term stage,"academical discourse"became the mainstream,and criminal procedure law research was in a development period of academic.In the late stage,microcosmic and technical discourse dominated,and academical research entered a deepening period of academic.Under the changing of discourse,the problems of criminal utilitarian theory and limited research methods are hidden.In the future,researchers should eliminate idealism in academic research and produce knowledge products with practical value.At the same time,they should focus on the application of empirical research methods to further realize the diversity of research methods.
Keywords:Discourse  Research on Criminal Procedure Law  Utilitarianism
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号