听证主持人法律地位比较与思考

在国外,程序司法化的一个突出表现就是听讧主持人地位的法律化.各国皆对听证主持人的法律地位作了充分研究和规定.目前大部分国家的行政程序法普遍采取职权主义模式,将听证主持人定位为占主导地位的听证指挥者,这违背了行政听证中的公正、平等等基本价值取向,可能使听证主持人的行为演变成具有强制力的具体行政行为.我国现行法律法规对于听证主持人的规定过于简单,对听证主持人的法律地位未涉及.在中国的行政听证活动中,听证主持人同普通法院的法官相比应当处于一种超然的地位,同听讧当事人应该是平等的关系,同其他行政机关应该是一种相互独立的关系.只有这样才能确保行政听证活动的公正和平等,使公民的合法权利得到保护.

Compare and Consideration of the Legal Status of Hearing Compere

In foreign countries a prominent characteristic of process judicature is that of the codification of the status of hearing compere. Many countries have studied and regulated the legal status of hearing compere.And now most of the laws of administrative process adopt the mode of authority and take hearing compere as oriented in hearing process.It violates the equity and equality of hearing and made the behavior of compere to be the compulsive administrative action.As to China's current law,particularly simple for the regulation of the legal status of hearing compere.Compare with the judge,hearing compere should be located transcendent status,which have pair relationship with the parties and absolute relationship with the service in Chinese administrative hearing.That will insure the justice of clerical work of the service and maintain the civic legal rights'.