民事再审之能动司法

民事诉讼法修改后最高人民法院和高级人民法院成为受理民事再审申请案件的主要管辖法院,民事申请再审作为独立诉讼程序正面临着重重困境。能动司法理念的提出,为解决民事再审工作困难指明了出路。中国语境下"能动司法"与美国"司法能动"有本质的区别,对"能动司法"的适度限制是"能动司法"意涵中的应有之义,通过能动司法制度建设,具体包括服务性、主动性、高效性的制度建设,解决民事再审审查工作中案多人少、涉诉信访压力大、各地裁定再审标准不统一等问题。

The Path of Active Judicial On Civil Retrial Procedure

Law of Civil Procedure Amendment revised procedure for trial supervision significantly.The new Law of Civil Procedure stipulates that civil retrial procedure is censored by the superior court.As a result of this amendment,the major jurisdiction courts which accept application of civil retrial are Supreme People’s Court and Higher People’s Court.As an independent procedure,civil retrial procedure is being faced deep trouble.Supreme People’s Court put the theory of active judicial forward,which we can apply to solve problems in the censor of civil retrial.There are obvious distinctions between the Active Judicial in Chinese and the Judicial Activism in American.The content of Active Judicial should be restricted moderately.We can resolve the problems of more cases,less judges,the press of complaint and appeal on suit and different standard of ruling retrial by construting related institutions of active judicial which are service,initiative,efficiency.