首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论瑕疵行政行为的效力
引用本文:黄全.论瑕疵行政行为的效力[J].政法学刊,2010,27(3):90-96.
作者姓名:黄全
作者单位:中国民航大学法学院,天津,300300
基金项目:中央高校科研基金专项课题 
摘    要:行政行为的效力包括形式效力与实质效力,两者构成了行政行为的效力体系。严重且明显瑕疵行政行为不具有形式效力的理论与制度混淆了形式效力与实质效力发生的基础。形式效力是基于行政行为的形式而具有的效力,与行政行为内容中的瑕疵无关,瑕疵行政行为都应具有形式效力。实质效力是基于行政行为内容的实质正当而具有的效力,不同的瑕疵将不同程度地影响着行政行为的实质效力并导致该行为被撤销、确认无效与治愈的法律后果。

关 键 词:瑕疵  形式效力  实质效力  法律后果

On the Legal Effect of Administrative Act with Flaw
Huang Quan.On the Legal Effect of Administrative Act with Flaw[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2010,27(3):90-96.
Authors:Huang Quan
Institution:Huang Quan ( School of Law, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China )
Abstract:The legal effect of administrative act consists of formal effect and substantive effect which together form the system of legal effect. The theory and system that administrative act with serious and obvious flaw has none formal effect confuses the foundations of formal effect and substantive effect. The administrative act has formal effect when it exists in form, whether it has flaw or not. The administrative act with legitimate contents has substantive effect. Different flaw will affect substantive effect of administrative act with different degree, and correspondently the legal consequences of administrative act with flaw will be different with the forms of being annulled, declared being illegal and cured.
Keywords:flaw formal effect  substantive effect  legal consequence
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号