| 行政疑难案件中举证责任的推定——从行政诉讼目的的角度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谢岚英.行政疑难案件中举证责任的推定——从行政诉讼目的的角度[J].福建公安高等专科学校学报,2003,17(6):68-71. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谢岚英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 谢岚英（福建省福州市晋安区公证处,福建,福州,350011） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 行政诉讼的目的就是保护公民的合法权益 ,正确认识行政诉讼的这一目的 ,可以恰当地推定疑难行政案件举证责任的分配 ,即从行政诉讼的目的角度考量 ,证明一具体行政行为是否合法必须由行政机关首先承担说服责任 ,但当法定的情形出现时 ,可以依法推定由当事人承担举证责任中的说服责任 ,在多个当事人中 ,又由有过错的当事人承担说服责任。
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政诉讼目的 疑难案件 举证责任 推定 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6048(2003)06-0068-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年7月24日 |
To Infer Proof- raising Responsibilities in Administrative Knotty Cases --From the Viewpoints of Administrative Lawsuits' Aims |
| |
| XIE Lan-ying.To Infer Proof- raising Responsibilities in Administrative Knotty Cases --From the Viewpoints of Administrative Lawsuits'''' Aims[J].The Study of Social Public Security,2003,17(6):68-71. |
| |
| Authors: | XIE Lan-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | The aim of administrative lawsuit is to protect civil citizens'legal rights. To correctly recognize this can properly infer the distribution of responsibilities in knotty administrative cases, that is , the administrative organs should bear the persuasive responsibilities to prove whether a concrete administrative act is legal or not from the angel of administrative lawsuit's aims. But when a legal occasion happens, it is legal to infer that the party concerned should bear the persuasion responsibilities when raising the proofs however, if there are several litigants, the wrong-doing one should bear persuasion responsibilities. |
| |
| Keywords: | aim of administrative lawsuit knotty case proof-raising resposesponsibilities infer |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
