首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

浅析网络平台服务商的名誉权侵权责任
引用本文:杨海静.浅析网络平台服务商的名誉权侵权责任[J].山西省政法管理干部学院学报,2009,22(4):53-56.
作者姓名:杨海静
作者单位:天津工业大学,人文与法学院,天津,300387
摘    要:网络的匿名特点使人们可以自由地发表言论而不会轻易被发现,民事主体的名誉权在网络环境下显得异常脆弱,越来越多的网络服务提供商卷入了侵权诉讼中。其中网络平台服务商应否对第三人的诽谤行为承担责任成为网络环境下亟待解决的问题。综合考量世界各国的立法和实践,结合我国的实际,在界定网络平台服务商责任时应以最低程度的注意义务和过错责任为宜。

关 键 词:网络服务提供商  网络平台服务商  名誉权

Tort Responsibility of Internet Platform Company's Reputation
YANG Hai-jing.Tort Responsibility of Internet Platform Company's Reputation[J].Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators,2009,22(4):53-56.
Authors:YANG Hai-jing
Institution:YANG Hai - jing (Humanity and Law School of Tianfin Industry University, Tianjin 300387 ,China)
Abstract:people can freely speak and cannot be found easily because the internet anonymous.So the reputation right of the civil subject becomes more fragile.More and more internet service providers fall into the lawsuits.Whether the internet platform provider should be responsible for the third party's libel is a problem to be solved especially.The paper firstly clears the function and characteristic of IPP by the classification,and then study the responsibility of IPP by comparison.The paper analyzes the legislation and the judicial practice in China and finally puts forward the responsibility of the IPP and the anonymous litigation.
Keywords:internet service provider  internet platform provider  the reputation right
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号