Balancing alternatives and avoiding false dichotomies to make informed U.S. electricity policy |
| |
Authors: | Frank A Felder Ruthanne Haut |
| |
Institution: | (1) Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, 33 Livingston Avenue, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-1958, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Recent events highlight the importance of electric energy policy and how to meet growing electricity demand. Price spikes,
global climate change and other environmental concerns, national security threats, an aging infrastructure, and a restructured
industry with mixed results are challenges that policy makers and the industry must address. Given the capital-intensive nature
of the industry, investment decisions will determine in large part how successfully these challenges are met. One paper that
favors energy efficiency, renewable energy, and small-scale distributed generation is examined in detail to test the proposition
that fossil fuel and nuclear power should be part of the mix of new investments. To determine the future electricity resource
mix requires having a complete and informed picture of the relative costs and benefits of various technologies. The levels
of energy efficiency, renewable resources, and distributed generation can and should be increased, but coal and nuclear generation
investments are also likely to be needed.
|
| |
Keywords: | Renewable energy Energy policy Electric utility industry Energy efficiency Nuclear power Fossil fuels |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|