首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国司法鉴定前置程序的缺失与建构
引用本文:宋平,张少会.我国司法鉴定前置程序的缺失与建构[J].黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报,2012(4):99-102.
作者姓名:宋平  张少会
作者单位:四川理工学院政法学院,四川自贡,643000
基金项目:四川医事卫生法治研究中心资助项目:“医学鉴定的‘二元化’问题研究——兼论医疗侵权司法鉴定制度改革”的阶段性研究成果(YF10-Y13)
摘    要:在诉讼中案件要件事实涉及专门知识时,法官需委托司法鉴定人对其进行专业性的事实进行判断并得出结论.大陆法系司法鉴定人被视为法官之事实审辅助人,帮助法官进行专业性事实认定,司法鉴定结论在案件中的作用举足轻重.作为入口的司法鉴定前置程序是结论客观、公正性的基础,尤其检材和鉴定资料的真实性具有决定性意义.通过公正的司法鉴定前置程序,保障鉴定材料的合法性、真实性,能够最大限度实现司法鉴定结论的公正性.

关 键 词:司法鉴定  鉴定材料  前置程序  客观公正

The Deficiency and Rebuilding of the Preposition Procedure of Forensic Expertise in China
Authors:SONG Ping  ZHANG Shao-hui
Institution:SONG Ping,ZHANG Shao-hui
Abstract:In a lawsuit,when facts involve professional knowledge,the judge needs to authorize forensic experts to make professional appraisal to get a conclusion.In the continental law system,the forensic expert is seen as an auxilian of the judge during the trial of facts.The forensic expertise conclusion plays an important role in the lawsuit.The preposition procedure of forensic expertise is the basis for an objective and impartial conclusion and the authenticity and validity of the materials sent for forensic appraisal play a key role in the appraisal.So,the construction of a just preposition procedure of forensic expertise can achieve the justice of forensic expertise to the largest degree.
Keywords:forensic expertise  materials for forensic appraisal  preposition procedure  objectiveness and justice
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号