首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

责任主义主导量刑情节适用之提倡——兼与《人民法院量刑指导意见(试行)》比较
引用本文:王瑞君.责任主义主导量刑情节适用之提倡——兼与《人民法院量刑指导意见(试行)》比较[J].政法论丛,2013(6):72-78.
作者姓名:王瑞君
作者单位:山东大学威海分校法学院,威海264209
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“赔偿影响刑罚:理论基础、实证考察与重新规范研究”(12YJA820076)的阶段性成果.
摘    要:作为刑法中保障国民自由的原理,责任主义成为法治国刑法中的一项基本原则.在量刑中贯彻责任主义,采取的是先责任后预防的量刑步骤,相应地,量刑情节区分为责任刑情节和预防刑情节,责任是刑罚的上限.相比较而言,我国《人民法院量刑指导意见(试行)》缺乏明确的原理支撑,对量刑步骤、量刑情节的适用顺序的规定,缺乏逻辑合理性,有必要予以修正.

关 键 词:责任主义  基准刑  预防刑  量刑情节

Using the Doctrine of Responsibility to Guide the Application of Sentencing Scenarios——Concurrently Discuss the Perfection of "Guiding Opinions on Sentencing by People's Court (Trial Implementation)"
Wang Rui-jun.Using the Doctrine of Responsibility to Guide the Application of Sentencing Scenarios——Concurrently Discuss the Perfection of "Guiding Opinions on Sentencing by People's Court (Trial Implementation)"[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2013(6):72-78.
Authors:Wang Rui-jun
Institution:Wang Rui-jun (Law School of Shandong University , Weihai 264209)
Abstract:As the principle of guaranteeing the freedom of people in criminal law, the Doctrine of Responsibili- ty become a basic principle of law ruling state' s criminal law. To implement the Doctrine of Responsibility in Sen- tencing, the Sentencing Procedure should be first Responsibility and then Prevention, correspondingly, the Senten- cing Scenarios are distinguished as Responsible Penalty Scenarios and Preventive Penalty Scenarios, Responsibility is the upper limit of Criminal Penalty. Comparatively, China' s "Guiding Opinions on Sentencing by People's Court ( Trial Implementation)" lack definite principle support, the provision on the application order of Sentencing Proce- dure and Sentencing Scenarios lack logical rationality, it is necessary to be modified.
Keywords:the doctrine of responsibility  reference penalty  preventive penalty  sentencing scenarios
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号