首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

民事诉讼时效制度的正当化理由探析
引用本文:徐发明. 民事诉讼时效制度的正当化理由探析[J]. 政法学刊, 2007, 24(1): 19-24
作者姓名:徐发明
作者单位:广之州律师事务所,广东,广州,510000
摘    要:诉讼时效制度的正当化理由仅在于保护不应再履行义务的债务人。这本是德国民法早已解决的问题,但在我国却总结出督促权利人行使权利、稳定社会秩序、方便案件审理、利于物尽其用四大理由。有学者更夸张地列出减少纠纷、保护一般债务人、保护债权人、保护第三人、进行市场调节等项理由,并牵强地与公平原则和诚实信用原则相联系。诉讼时效制度正当化理由的原理还包括其必然性根源和负面性影响等内容。这些原理对审判实践有重要的指导意义。

关 键 词:民法  诉讼时效  理由
文章编号:1009-3745(2007)01-0019-06
修稿时间:2007-01-04

A Probe on the Proper Excuse in the System of Limitation of Actions
Xu Fa-ming. A Probe on the Proper Excuse in the System of Limitation of Actions[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2007, 24(1): 19-24
Authors:Xu Fa-ming
Abstract:The proper excuse in the system of limitation of actions is only used to protect the debtors who ought not to fulfill their responsibilities.This issue has already been settled in German civil laws for a long time,but some scholars in China exaggerate its functions in that it can supervise and urge the obligee to execute power,maintain social order,be convenient for the trail of cases and make the best use of everything.The proper excuse in the system of limitation of actions includes its necessary origin and negative influence,etc.Such theories are instructive in judicial practice.
Keywords:civil law  limitation of actions  excuse
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号