首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

重构我国行政诉讼原告资格制度的思考
引用本文:侯勇.重构我国行政诉讼原告资格制度的思考[J].行政法学研究,2004(4):62-68.
作者姓名:侯勇
作者单位:山东省高级人民法院行政庭,山东,济南,250014
摘    要:基于对我国行政诉讼制度发展现状的考虑 ,我国行政诉讼类型目前宜划分为撤销诉讼、确认诉讼、履行诉讼等三类。在此基础上 ,可借鉴美国的“事实损害标准”确立一种以“权益损害”为基本标准 ,视诉讼类型的不同而起诉条件各异 ,并辅之以“案例规则”为适当补充的原告资格制度基本框架。在三种诉讼类型中 ,撤销诉讼的原告资格最为宽泛 ,确认诉讼的原告资格要窄于撤销诉讼 ,履行诉讼的原告资格最易于确定。

关 键 词:原告资格  诉讼类型  权益损害

Re - construction of the System of Qualification of the Plaintiff in Administrative Litigation
HOU Yong.Re - construction of the System of Qualification of the Plaintiff in Administrative Litigation[J].Administrative Law Review,2004(4):62-68.
Authors:HOU Yong
Abstract:Considering the reality of the development of the system of administrative litigation in China, it is suitable to divide the administrative litigation into three types: action of revocation, action of affirmation and action of performance Based on this classification, a framework of the system of qualification of the plaintiff can be determined with “rights and interests infringed” as the fundamental standard with “case rules” as its complement We should differentiate the requirements of accusation according to different action types Among these three types of actions, the plaintiff's qualification is most lenient in the first type, and the strictest in the third type
Keywords:Plaintiff's Qualification  Type of Action  Rights and Interests Infringed
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号