首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

"媒体审判"、"舆论审判"检讨
引用本文:周泽."媒体审判"、"舆论审判"检讨[J].中国青年政治学院学报,2005,24(3):128-133.
作者姓名:周泽
作者单位:中国青年政治学院,新闻与传播系,北京,100089
摘    要:任何人都不能做自己的"法官".任何法官都只能对纷争本身做出裁判,而司法是否公正,理应接受民众的评判--"媒体审判"、"舆论审判".法官判案是以法庭审理查明的"事实"为依据,以法律为准绳,而不是以媒体报道的"事实"为依据,以"舆论"为准绳."媒体审判"、"舆论审判"误导司法之说无从谈起.控制"媒体审判"、"舆论审判"的想法是危险的,实践是徒劳的.

关 键 词:媒体审判  舆论审判  司法公正
文章编号:1002-8919(2005)03-0128-06
修稿时间:2004年1月14日

Review on "Media Judgment" and "Opinion Judgment"
ZHOU Ze.Review on "Media Judgment" and "Opinion Judgment"[J].Journal of China Youth College for Political Sciences,2005,24(3):128-133.
Authors:ZHOU Ze
Abstract:Any person cannot serve as the "judge" of himself. A judge can merely make a judgment on the conflicts. However, whether jurisdiction is rightful or not will depend on the public'judgment--"media judgment" and "opinion judgment". A judge makes his judgment on the ground of the "fact" heard and clarified at court. It is based on the laws and in referential to the opinion but not on the "fact" reported by media that he makes his judgment. In this sense, the view that "media judgment" and "opinion judgment" have misled jurisdiction is groundless. Therefore, the idea of controlling "media judgment" and "opinion judgment" is dangerous, and its practice seems to be futile too.
Keywords:media judgment  opinion judgment  rightful jurisdiction  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号