首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

恶意诉讼侵权之责任主体与救济路径
引用本文:于锐.恶意诉讼侵权之责任主体与救济路径[J].行政与法,2011(8).
作者姓名:于锐
作者单位:黑龙江大学,黑龙江哈尔滨,150086
基金项目:黑龙江省2010年哲学社会科学规划项目“人本视域中的民事诉权保障研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:03B134
摘    要:诉权行使的副产品为诉权之滥用。因此,为了有效防止诉讼、仲裁等纠纷解决方式被滥用,对恶意诉讼侵权责任的主体应持广义论。本文认为,除当事人外,诉讼代理人、鉴定人、证人乃至裁判者如果与当事人存在合谋或者独立实施了严重的程序滥用行为,应被追究侵权责任。作为法定之债,恶意诉讼的侵权责任应当通过审判程序来追究和实现。提起恶意诉讼侵权之诉是主要途径,具有普适性,而在本诉中提起反诉,或在原仲裁程序进行当中提出反请求,则具有合并审理的效率优势。

关 键 词:恶意诉讼  侵权责任  责任主体  救济路径  

On Responsible Subject and Remedy Measures of Malicious Litigations
Yu Rui.On Responsible Subject and Remedy Measures of Malicious Litigations[J].Public Administration & Law,2011(8).
Authors:Yu Rui
Abstract:Right to appeal can be abused.In order to prevent litigation,arbitration and other dispute resolutions abuse,tort liability for malicious litigation should be holding broadly.The responsible subjects of malicious litigations are comprehensive.In addition to the parties,the legal representatives,experts,witnesses and judges can become the responsible subjects if they are co-offenders to conduct malicious litigations.As the legal debt,tort liability must be investigated and achieved by trial procedures.The re...
Keywords:malicious litigation  tort liability  responsible subject  remedy measures  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号