| 反垄断法的终极目的及其司法保障 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 颜运秋.反垄断法的终极目的及其司法保障[J].时代法学,2005,3(6):45-53. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 颜运秋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湘潭大学法学院,湖南,湘潭,411105 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目“公益诉讼法律制度研究”(05BFX0045)的阶段性成果之一。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 反垄断法的目的具有宣示性和导向性,为所有的实体规则和程序规则提供价值基础。如果反垄断法的目的设置不当或者混乱,将增大反垄断法实施的难度,削弱反垄断法的主题。传统观点认为,反垄断法的目的只在于维护有效的公平竞争秩序,但相对于保护消费者权益的终极目的而言,这种目的只是工具性的。这在立法上有明显的体现,在学理上有充分的理由并在司法上有广泛的实践。我国未来的反垄断立法、执法与司法应当将保护消费者权益作为其终极目的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 反垄断法 反垄断诉讼 终极目的 消费者权益保护 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-769X(2005)06-0045-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年9月20日 |
The Ultimate Aim of Antitrust Law and its Judicial Protection |
| |
| Yan Yunqiu.The Ultimate Aim of Antitrust Law and its Judicial Protection[J].Presentday Law Science,2005,3(6):45-53. |
| |
| Authors: | Yan Yunqiu |
| |
| Abstract: | The aim of antitrust law with the characteristics of announcement and orientation offers the foundation for all substantive and procedural rules. When designed improperly, it will aggrandize the difficulties in its application and weaken its theme. The traditional opinion believes the aim of antitrust law only lies in keeping the fair order of competition efficiently; but compared with the ultimate aim, it is just an instrumental one, which is clearly embodied in legislation, and has sufficient reason in academic as well as abroad practice in judicatory. The lawmaking, enforcement and judicatory of the coming China Antitrust Law should take the protection of consumers' rights and interests as its ultimate aim. |
| |
| Keywords: | antitrust law antitrust litigation ultimate aim the protection of consumers' rights and interests |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
