首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Understanding the rule of prevalence in the NIS directive: C-ITS as a case study
Institution:1. University of Lodz, Kopcinskiego 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland;2. University of Zurich, Bahnhofstrasse 70/ P.O. Box, Zürich CH 8021, Switzerland;1. Faculty of Law and St Edmund Hall, University of Oxford, United Kingdom;2. Faculty of Law and Pembroke College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom;3. Department of Education, University of Oxford, United Kingdom;1. Faculty of Law & Criminology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (LSTS), Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium;2. Tilburg University (TILT), the Netherlands;1. School of Law, King''s College London, United Kingdom;2. Research Associate, School of Law, King''s College London
Abstract:The paper discusses the interpretation of the rule of prevalence of Article 1 (7) NIS Directive, which has not been the subject of any academic debate so far. Article 1 (7) NIS Directive organises the interface between the NIS Directive regime and other European Union sector-specific legislations imposing (cyber)security obligations, by laying down the conditions according to which such obligations would prevail over the NIS Directive regime. Based on the case study of the recent proposal from the European Commission to regulate Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (‘C-ITS’), the paper unravels a number of issues and unclarities. Recommendations are made with respect to the interpretation and application of the rule of prevalence of Article 1 (7) NIS Directive. In anticipation of a potential future C-ITS regulation and in the context of a possible upcoming revision of the NIS Directive, the paper also makes suggestions to ease the regulation of the interface between the NIS Directive and other (cyber-)security regulation, particularly in the field of C-ITS.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号