|
|||||
|
|
| 人格混同与法人独立地位之否认*--评最高人民法院指导案例15号 | |
| 引用本文： | 王军. 人格混同与法人独立地位之否认*--评最高人民法院指导案例15号[J]. 北方法学, 2015, 0(4): 43-48 |
| 作者姓名： | 王军 |
| 作者单位： | 中国政法大学 |
| 基金项目： | 中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队资助项目。 |
| 摘 要： | 15号指导案例反映了最高人民法院"慎重适用"、"从严掌握"法人独立地位否认的立场,但存在三点不足:一是偏重"人格混同"之构成的论述,而对"人格混同"为何"严重损害"债权人缺乏说明和论证。由此可能产生鼓励法院轻易否认法人独立地位的负面效果。二是"参照"适用《公司法》第20条第3款不符合类推适用的要求。三是将"关联公司"作为认定"横向人格混同"进而否认法人独立地位的约束条件,合理性和可操作性不足。 |
| 关 键 词： | 人格混同 法人 类推适用 关联公司 |
Confusion of Personality and Disregard of Legal Personality---Comment on No.15 of Cases Summary by the Supreme Court |
|
| WANG Jun. Confusion of Personality and Disregard of Legal Personality---Comment on No.15 of Cases Summary by the Supreme Court[J]. Northern Legal Science, 2015, 0(4): 43-48 | |
| Authors: | WANG Jun |
| Abstract: | No.15 of Cases Summary by the Supreme Court has adopted the stance that disregard of legal personality should be “prudently applied”and “strictly determined”,which nevertheless has three shortcom-ings.Firstly,the argumentation for constitution of personality confusion is improperly emphasized while the reason why personality confusion would gravely impair the creditor lacks proof and argumentation,which would cause negative effects that the court tends to easily disregard legal personality.Secondly,the “referential ap-plication”of Paragraph 3 under Article 20 of the Corporate Law does not satisfy requirements of analogy appli-cation.Thirdly,it lacks rationale and feasibility to determine the “affiliated corporates”as “horizontal person-ality confusion”and further as restricted condition for disregarding legal personality. |
| Keywords: | confusion of personality legal personality analogy application affiliated corporates |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |