从"无理"的判决到判决书"说理"--判决书说理制度的正当性分析

由于受到大陆法系传统的影响 ,我国判决说理并没有被制度化 ,甚至长时间囿于是否需要制度化的讨论中。笔者通过分析认为 ,在中国现有的司法语境中 ,判决说理具有急需正当化、制度化的内在需求。一是 ,判决说理是法官权力公开化的必然 ,同时也是一种法官自保的策略性选择 ;二是 ,判决说理是司法职能现代化的内在需求 ,力求通过判决说理达到当事人从内心“服判”的司法追求。笔者通过比较分析进一步指出了说理主体、说理对象等判决说理的前提性问题

From the "No Reason" Decision to Judgment "Argumentation" --Analysis of Justness of Judgment Argumentation

Because of the influence of the Civil Law tradition, the reasoning of judgment has not been institutionalized, and even been limited in the discussion whether it needs to be. Through analysis, we realize that there is an inherent requirementfor the institutionalization of it in the recent Chinese judicial context. For the first, the reasoning of the judgment is the result of the open for judge's power, and also is the judge's strategy for self-protection; for the second, it is the inherent demand of the modernization of judicial function, if can make the civilian admit the decision in the deep heart. After that, through analyzing by comparison, we try to ascertain the fundamental problems such as the subject, object of the reasoning, and so on.