首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“三位一体”量刑规范化模式的选择及架构——以对当前量刑规范化模式的反思为视角
引用本文:戴承欢,黄书建.“三位一体”量刑规范化模式的选择及架构——以对当前量刑规范化模式的反思为视角[J].北京政法职业学院学报,2011(3):11-16.
作者姓名:戴承欢  黄书建
作者单位:1. 湖南文理学院
2. 宁波市江北区人民法院
摘    要:电脑量刑、量刑建议、量刑程序、量刑指南等主张,或偏执于量刑程序的规范化,或偏执于量刑实体的规范化,不能实现量刑公正。我们应构建以量刑程序为基础,以量刑指南为指导,以量刑说理为辅助的"三位一体"量刑规范化模式,同时兼顾量刑程序与实体公正,确保量刑公正的有效实现。

关 键 词:量刑公正  量刑规范化“  三位一体”模式

Choice and the Frame of the Trinity Mode of Sentencing Standardization:Reconsidering the Current Mode
Dai Chenghuan , Huang Shujian.Choice and the Frame of the Trinity Mode of Sentencing Standardization:Reconsidering the Current Mode[J].bejing college of political science and law journal,2011(3):11-16.
Authors:Dai Chenghuan  Huang Shujian
Institution:Dai Chenghuan and Huang Shujian
Abstract:The advocacy for computerized sentencing,sentencing recommendation,sentencing procedure and sentencing guidelines is not likely to realize fair sentencing,as it is either biased towards sentencing procedure standardization or standardization of entity in a sentence.We should design a trinity mode of sentencing standardization based on sentencing procedure,directed by sentencing guidelines and assisted by sentencing argument,and at the same time we should give consideration to fairness in procedure and entit...
Keywords:fair sentencing  sentencing standardization  the trinity mode  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号