首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑诉中尿液证据采集问题研究——以德国为参照
引用本文:屈奇.刑诉中尿液证据采集问题研究——以德国为参照[J].政法学刊,2011,28(2):76-80.
作者姓名:屈奇
作者单位:韩山师范学院政法系,广东潮州,521041
摘    要:对被指控人尿液证据的强制采集会侵犯其人身自由权、身体完整权与隐私权,因此必须谨慎而为之,进行严格限制。域外国家,比如大陆法系国家的德国通常采取比例原则、法律保留原则以及令状主义进行有效规制,以实现控制犯罪与保障人权的均衡。我国关于尿液证据的采集与运用还是一片空白,相关的立法建议还存在不足,需要重新检讨。

关 键 词:比例原则  法律保留原则  令状主义  证据能力

A Study on the Collection of Urine Evidence in Criminal Procedure-With a Reference to German
Qu Qi.A Study on the Collection of Urine Evidence in Criminal Procedure-With a Reference to German[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2011,28(2):76-80.
Authors:Qu Qi
Institution:Qu Qi(Dept.of Political Science and Law,Hanshan Normal University,ChaoZhou 521041,China)
Abstract:The compulsory collection of urine evidence against the accused will infringe upon his or her right of personal liberty,physical integrity and privacy.Therefore,it must be done carefully and put strict restrictions on its application.Civil law countries,such as Germany,usually adopts the principle of proportionality,legal principles and the writ doctrine to effectively regulate it in order to achieve the balance of controlling crime and protection of human rights.China's regulations on the collection of uri...
Keywords:the principle of proportionality  the principle of legal reservation  Warrant  the admissibility of evidence  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号