首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不当得利法上获利返还责任之探讨--兼评最高人民法院相关司法解释
引用本文:陈开南,谢平.不当得利法上获利返还责任之探讨--兼评最高人民法院相关司法解释[J].湖南公安高等专科学校学报,2005,17(3):81-83.
作者姓名:陈开南  谢平
作者单位:宁海县人民法院,浙江,宁波,315600
摘    要:获利返还责任是不当得利法上最具争论的问题之一.传统民法对此有两种完全不同的学说,即获利应返还说与获利不返还说.最高人民法院的有关司法解释主张对受益人获取的利润应予收缴,其主张违背了民法的本质和基本理念以及经济规律的要求,<民法通则>的有关规定也过于原则性,而不具有可操作性.

关 键 词:获利返还责任  合法行为  分配机制
文章编号:1008-7575(2005)03-0081-03
修稿时间:2005年4月25日

A Discution on the Responsibility of Making a Profit and Returning on Unjustified Enrichment Law comments of the relevant judicial explanation of the Supreme People's Court
CHEN Kai-nan,XIE Ping.A Discution on the Responsibility of Making a Profit and Returning on Unjustified Enrichment Law comments of the relevant judicial explanation of the Supreme People's Court[J].Journal of Huan Public Security College,2005,17(3):81-83.
Authors:CHEN Kai-nan  XIE Ping
Abstract: The responsibility of making a profit and returning is the most disputable problem in unjustified enrichment law. Traditional civil law have two different theory totally to this, one is the profit should be returned, another is the profit should not be returned. Thus the relevant judicial explanation of the Supreme People's Court maintain that the profit of the beneficiary obtained should be taken over, it has violated the essence , basic idea and demand for the economic law of the civil law, the relevant regulations of " general rule of the civil law "has overly sense of principle , and does not have effective nesses.
Keywords:making a profit and returning responsibility  lawful action  distribution mechanism    
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号