首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

合同诈骗罪若干问题探究
引用本文:胡学相,黄保勇.合同诈骗罪若干问题探究[J].国家检察官学院学报,2004,12(5):35-41.
作者姓名:胡学相  黄保勇
作者单位:华南理工大学,广东,广州,510640
摘    要:合同诈骗罪主观上是以非法占有为目的。"非法占有",是指对合法财产所有权的破坏,它与民法上的非法占有含义不同,也与非法占用含义不同。合同诈骗罪与经济合同纠纷的界限主要在于从主观目的上加以区别。对非法目的的判断,在我国采用司法推定的方法来确定。对于司法推定应当允许被告人提出反证,以防止出现冤假错案。

关 键 词:合同诈骗罪  非法占有  数罪  合同纠纷  司法推定
文章编号:1004-9428(2004)05-0035-07
修稿时间:2004年2月23日

Research on Fraud of Contract Crime
HU Xue-xiang,HUANG Bao-yong.Research on Fraud of Contract Crime[J].Journal of National Procurators College,2004,12(5):35-41.
Authors:HU Xue-xiang  HUANG Bao-yong
Abstract:To occupy unlawfully is deemed to be the purpose of fraud of contract crime. The meaning of "occupy unlawfully" here is on a broad sense, namely, refers to the damage of lawful property rights. And it is different not only from the crime named unlawfully occupy but also from the action of unlawfully use. Besides, it could be told the fraud of contract crime from the disputes of commercial contracts mainly because of their different subjective purposes.In our country, judicial presumption is the approach used to ascertain the "unlawful purpose." Of course, counter-evidence should be allowed to provide during the same procedure in case that impartial decisions be made.
Keywords:fraud of contract crime  unlawfully occupy  several crimes  dispute of contract  judicial presumption
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号