首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑法因果关系论之危机、反思与出路
引用本文:杨彩霞.刑法因果关系论之危机、反思与出路[J].国家检察官学院学报,2004,12(4):25-33.
作者姓名:杨彩霞
作者单位:武汉大学,法学院,武汉,430072
摘    要:刑法中研究因果关系是为了解决归责问题,因而不能用哲学因果关系的研究代替之。而事实因果关系根本不需要在刑法的领域探讨。刑法所要解决的只是法律因果关系的问题。为了与刑法的宗旨相连,并且坚持因果判断上的客观性,不如将法律因果关系的概念转化为客观可归责性的概念,并借鉴德日有关理论,创设具体的判断规则。

关 键 词:因果关系  事实因果关系  法律因果关系  客观可归责性
文章编号:1004-9428(2004)04-0025-09
修稿时间:2004年2月20日

Crisis,Reconsideration and Way out of the Theory of Causality in Criminal Law
YANG Cai-xia.Crisis,Reconsideration and Way out of the Theory of Causality in Criminal Law[J].Journal of National Procurators College,2004,12(4):25-33.
Authors:YANG Cai-xia
Abstract:There are many problems in the research on criminal causality. On one hand, the status of causality in the theory of criminal law is not accurate, on the other hand, how to judge it is difficult. It is not only tend to let subjective element into range of analysis ahead of time, but also difficult to put down the argument between the theory of necessity and accident. There are also problems in logic. In fact, investigating causality in theory of criminal law is to solve the problem of liability fixation, so we can't substitute it for philosophy research on causality. Factual causality needn't be discussed, while legal causality is the sole problem to be solved in criminal law. In order to connect with the purpose of criminal law and withhold objectivism in judging causality, we might as well convert the concept of legal causality to concept of capability of objective liability fixation, and introduce some relevant theory in Germany and Japan to expound specific judging rules.
Keywords:causality  factual causality  legal causality  capability of objective liability fixation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号