首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

美国行政纠纷仲裁的合宪性问题及其启示
引用本文:李娟.美国行政纠纷仲裁的合宪性问题及其启示[J].行政法学研究,2008(3):131-135.
作者姓名:李娟
作者单位:武汉大学法学院,武汉,430072
摘    要:美国行政纠纷仲裁的裁决对当事人具有法律约束力、强制执行力和终局性效力,被认为涉及美国宪法上的分权原则、正当程序原则等一系列重要宪法原则,其合宪性曾一度遭遇质疑。作为一种在不同的法律秩序中完成同一功能的规则,美国行政纠纷仲裁制度的合宪性之确立,为学界探究我国多元化行政纠纷解决机制的合法性基础提供了一种比较与借鉴的视角。

关 键 词:行政纠纷  仲裁  合宪性

Review on Constitutionality of Binding Arbitration of Administrative Dispute in the United States and its Inspirations
LI Juan.Review on Constitutionality of Binding Arbitration of Administrative Dispute in the United States and its Inspirations[J].Administrative Law Review,2008(3):131-135.
Authors:LI Juan
Abstract:Binding arbitration,on the basis of voluntary agreements,renders for both agency and private parties a final and binding decision which only can be subject to judicial review with very little grounds,and once attracted great attention over its constitutionality for getting involved in some important constitutional doctrines,such as power division and due process of law.Constitutionality demonstration is very important for binding arbitration to gain general applicability in administrative dispute resolution,as well as for us to explore our path to the diversity of administrative dispute resolution in China.
Keywords:Administrative Dispute  Binding Arbitration  Constitutionality
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号