首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

谁是非法讯问的受益者?--侦查讯问的博弈分析
引用本文:胡卫平.谁是非法讯问的受益者?--侦查讯问的博弈分析[J].铁道警官高等专科学校学报,2006,16(1):44-50.
作者姓名:胡卫平
作者单位:西安政治学院,军事安全保卫系,陕西,西安,710068
摘    要:博弈论是研究冲突对抗条件下最优决策问题的理论,将其经典模型“囚徒困境”与侦查讯问进行类比,可以建立讯问中警察与犯罪嫌疑人的博弈模型。在我国,警察和犯罪嫌疑人博弈遭到破解的主要原因是警察的合法讯问和非法讯问策略、犯罪嫌疑人的坦白和抗拒策略均存在严重的效用倒置,这也是导致警察选择非法讯问,而犯罪嫌疑人选择抗拒策略的主要原因。为倒正警察和犯罪嫌疑人策略的效用,必须建立非法口供排除规则、明确口供合法性的证明责任、完善非法讯问法律责任体系、消除认定事实对口供的依赖、提高强制措施的适用标准等。

关 键 词:博弈论  囚徒困境  侦查讯问  策略  效用
文章编号:1009-3192(2006)01-0044-07
修稿时间:2006年1月2日

Who is the Beneficiary of Illegal Interrogation?--Game Theory Analyses on Investigative Interrogation
Hu Weiping.Who is the Beneficiary of Illegal Interrogation?--Game Theory Analyses on Investigative Interrogation[J].Journal of Railway Ministry Zhengzhou Police College,2006,16(1):44-50.
Authors:Hu Weiping
Abstract:Game theory is the theory about the issue of optimal on the condition of conflict and antagonism.Drawing an analogy between prisoner's dilemma model and investigation can set up a game model between the(police) and the accused in investigative interrogation.In our country,the reason why investigation interrogation game breaks up is that the avail of policeman's legal interrogation and illegal interrogation strategy as well as the(accused's) confess and deny strategy is reversed.In order to rectify the payoff of the policeman and the accused's strategy,(it's) necessary to set up the rule of exclusion illegally obtained confess,establish the principle of burden of proof on confess validity,perfect the legal liability system of illegal interrogation,reduce the dependence on confess when finding the fact,enhance the criterion of enforcement measure and so on.
Keywords:game theory  the prisoner's dilemma  investigative interrogation  strategy  effectiveness
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号