首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

民事主体与民事诉讼主体有限分离论之反思
引用本文:谭启平.民事主体与民事诉讼主体有限分离论之反思[J].现代法学,2007,29(5):143-152.
作者姓名:谭启平
作者单位:西南政法大学,重庆,400031
摘    要:对民事主体与民事诉讼主体的关系,我国现今学界主流持有限分离论。此论是对现行法律的误读及对两主体关系应然与实然的混淆。实体法与程序法在主体制度上的失衡,已成为两法共同有效地实现保障权利、解决民事纠纷、维护社会经济秩序等民事诉讼目的的巨大障碍。自然人、法人、非法人团体的"三元"民事主体结构,应成为我国民事立法关于民事主体结构构建的基本结构。民事主体与民事诉讼主体,应当是内涵有别但外延一致的关系。

关 键 词:民事主体  民事诉讼主体  非法人团体  民法的“逃逸”  主体类型化
文章编号:1001-2397(2007)05-0143-10
修稿时间:2007年6月20日

Reconsideration of the Finite Separation of the Persona in Civil Affairs and the Persona in Civil Proceedings
TAN Qi-ping.Reconsideration of the Finite Separation of the Persona in Civil Affairs and the Persona in Civil Proceedings[J].Modern Law Science,2007,29(5):143-152.
Authors:TAN Qi-ping
Abstract:In regard to the persona in civil affairs and the persona in civil proceedings, the academic mainstream in China holds a "finite separation" doctrine, which, in this author’s opinion, indicates a misunderstanding and confusion of "the should-be state" and the "actual state" of the two personas. The fact that the substantive law and the adjective law differ in persona has proved an immense obstacle to effective protection of rights, resolution of civil disputes and maintenance of social economic order. A "ternary-persona structure" including natural person, juristic person and unincorporated society should be deemed as the fundamental structure of the subject of a civil legal relationship in China’s civil law. The persona in civil affairs and the persona in civil proceedings are in fact different in connotation but similar in extension.
Keywords:persona in civil affairs  persona in civil proceedings  unincorporated society  "avoidance" of civil law  categorization of personas
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号