分析学还是解释学——法律论证之知识属性辨析

论证理论主要源于分析学,这一点一般为大多数学者所接受。鉴于解释学与分析哲学在哲学上大体分属两种不同的思维传统,因此,解释学与论证理论之关系便值得探讨。法律论证理论固然来源于分析学的传统,但如果没有解释学知识的支持,它也是不可能的。可以说,没有解释的论证是空洞的,没有论证的解释是盲目的。二者均致力于型构具有实践理性品格的法学知识。

Analytics or Hermeneutics Differentiate and Analyze the Knowledge Attribute of Legal Argumentation

It is widely accepted that the theory of argumentatio n has primarily originated from analytic philosophy. It also deserves to treat on the relation between hermeneutics and theory of argumentation since both hermene utics and analytic philosophy have contributed to different tradition for a long time in philosophy. Surely we can say that theory of legal argumentation origin ates from the analytic philosophical tradition, but it is also impossible withou t assistance by hermeneutics. In a word, it is empty for argumentation without b acking by hermeneutics, as blind for interpretation without theory of argumentat ion. Both interpretation and argumentation contribute to the formalisation of th e knowledge of law with the character of practical reason.