民事检察建议刍议——以与抗诉的关系协调为视角

2012年全面修订后的《民事诉讼法》增设了"检察建议",作为与抗诉相并列的检察监督机制。这一非讼性、沟通性的同级监督手段,在性质、功能、适用条件、适用范围、具体规则以及法律效力等方面均与抗诉制度有所区别。应当在准确定位抗诉与检察建议之优劣势的基础上,以比例原则、穷尽其他救济原则、公开原则和说理原则为总体指引,科学定位两类监督机制的应然功能和作用边界,同时配以相应的具体程序、规则和法律效力,进而推动多元化、创新型、协作型检察监督机制体系的构建,促进诉权、审判权、检察监督权三者之间的良性互动关系和资源优化配置。

On Civil Prosecutorial Suggestion

The Law of Civil Procedure after being thoroughly amended in 2012 added ＂prosecutorial suggestion＂ as a parallel prosecutorial supervision mechanism of counterappeal.As a non-lawsuit,communicative supervision measure,civil prosecutorial suggestion is different from counterappeal in characteristics,functions,condition of application,scope of application,specific regulations and legal validity.Based on accurate positioning their advantages and disadvantages,the functions and boundary of effects of the two kinds of supervision mechanisms shall be scientifically clarified according to the principle of proportionality,the ending legal relief principle,the principle of full disclosure,and argue principle.Meanwhile,specific program,regulation and legal validity shall be established to promote the construction of a multiple,creative and collaborative procuratorial supervision mechanism,to facilitate a benign interaction among the right of action,judicial authority and power of supervision,and to optimize distribution of resources.