| 松散式、汇编式的民法典不适合中国国情 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 梁慧星.松散式、汇编式的民法典不适合中国国情[J].政法论坛,2003(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 梁慧星 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国社会科学院 北京100720 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 民法典草案是原封不动地将现行法编入 ,是彻底的松散式和汇编式的 ,与人民所期望的民法典差距甚大。中国应当制定一部具有逻辑性和体系性的民法典 ,1 0 0年前 ,前人已经替我们作出了选择 ,在历经百年所形成的法律传统面前 ,任何立法者和学者都是渺小的。取消“债权”概念和“债权总则编”的理由站不住脚。人格权不应单独设编 ,基本理由在于人格权的特殊本质。
|
| 关 键 词： | 民法典草案 法律传统 债权总则编 人格权 |
Incompact and Assembled Civil Code is Improper to the Situation of China |
| |
| LIANG Hui-xing.Incompact and Assembled Civil Code is Improper to the Situation of China[J].Tribune of Political Science and Law,2003(1). |
| |
| Authors: | LIANG Hui-xing |
| |
| Abstract: | The draft of Civil Cold is the compilation of the existing laws without any changes. It is in incompact and assembled style, which is far from people's expectation. China should make a civil code with logic and system/ A century ago, our ancestors have made options for us. In frond of the legal tradition that has undergone a hundred years, any legislators and scholars are chickenshit. There is no ground for canceling the concepts "right of obligation" and "the General Principles of Right of Obligation". The right of personality shall notbe put in a separate part. The basic reason for it is the special nature of the right of personality. |
| |
| Keywords: | Draft of Civil Code Legal Tradition Part of the General Principles of Right of Obligation Right of Personality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
