首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

日中刑事起诉原则比较
引用本文:李新枝,李传轩.日中刑事起诉原则比较[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2003,18(1):54-55.
作者姓名:李新枝  李传轩
作者单位:安徽大学法学院,安徽,合肥,230039
摘    要:日中刑事起诉原则差异主要表现为 :日本没有自诉制度 ,我国有自诉制度 ;日本实行起诉裁量主义 ,我国起诉裁量权受到很大限制 ;日本被害人仅有“准起诉权”,我国赋予被害人直接起诉权。虽然日本现代刑事诉讼制度许多值得我们借鉴但不能忽视国情盲目移植。

关 键 词:刑事诉讼  起诉原则  日本  中国  比较
文章编号:1008-8628(2003)01-0054-02
修稿时间:2002年7月16日

Comparison Between Japanese and Chinese Principles of Criminal Prosecution
LI Xin-zhi,LI Chuan-xuan.Comparison Between Japanese and Chinese Principles of Criminal Prosecution[J].Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law,2003,18(1):54-55.
Authors:LI Xin-zhi  LI Chuan-xuan
Abstract:There are some major differences between Japanese and Chinese principles of criminal prosecutions: in Japan there is no a system of private prosecution which exists in China. Right of determination to prosecution is carried out in Japan, while there is great limit to that in China. In Japan, the victims hold the "relative right of prosecution", but China gives the victims the right of direct prosecution. There are some things from Japanese modern criminal prosecution system which we can use for reference, but it does not mean we can transplant it blindly in China.
Keywords:criminal prosecution  prosecution principle  Japan  China  comparison  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号