强制调解模式研究

通过搭建“强制调解的主导者”和“强制调解的适用阶段”两个维度所形成的框架，可以对强制调解进行类型化分析并提炼出四种模式。一国或地区选择何种强制调解模式，要受到程序正义理念、传统法律程序等因素的综合影响。基于我国实际，未来有必要引入司法性诉前强制调解模式，实现从程序保障提高、调解人适格和制裁措施到位三方面确保诉前强制调解优势的发挥，同时有必要对我国原有的司法性诉中强制调解模式进行改造，实现调解者与审判者身份的分离和调解程序与审判程序时空的分离，并在立法中明确赋予法官动态裁量调解启动的权力以及启动调解时应当考虑的基准。

Study on the Model of Mandatory Mediation

By putting up a framework which is composed of the leader and the stage of mandatory mediation, we can implement classifying analysis on the mandatory mediation and conclude four basic models. It would be im- pacted by the idea of procedural justice, traditional legal procedure etc when a country or an area selects the models of mandatory mediation. According to our situation, it is necessary to introduce the non-judicial pre-pleading manda- tory mediation in order to implement the function of the pre-pleading mandatory mediation from the three aspects： procedural guarantee, qualified mediator and sanction measure. At the same time, it is also necessary to reform the original judicial lawsuit mandatory mediation from two aspects. On one hand, we should realize the separation of me- diation and trail by the separation of identity as well as the separation of time-space. On the other hand, we should regulate basic criterion so as to guide judge to determine the stating of this kind of mediation correctly.