| 从加拿大影响汽车产业措施案析最惠国待遇原则的适用 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 褚晓琳,王彬.从加拿大影响汽车产业措施案析最惠国待遇原则的适用[J].山西省政法管理干部学院学报,2004,17(2):55-60. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 褚晓琳 王彬 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学法学院 山东济南250100
(褚晓琳),山东大学法学院 山东济南250100(王彬) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过对加拿大影响汽车产业措施案分析 ,最惠国待遇原则在具体适用中存在三个问题 :第一是关于GATT1994第 1条规定的“无条件”一词的解释 ;第二是关于GATT1994第 1条是否包括法律上与事实上的歧视 ;第三是关于加拿大影响汽车产业的措施能否为GATT1994第 2 4条所豁免。WTO争端解决机制已由注重对一些大的原则的解释转变为对具体条款中某一概念或术语的解释。我国已加入WTO ,应注重如何适用最惠国待遇原则
|
| 关 键 词： | 最惠国待遇原则 “无条件” 歧视 关税同盟与自由贸易区 启示 |
On the Application of Most-Favored-Nation Treatment on the Basis of the Case of Canada-Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry |
| |
| ZHU Xiao-lin,WANG Bin.On the Application of Most-Favored-Nation Treatment on the Basis of the Case of Canada-Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry[J].Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators,2004,17(2):55-60. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHU Xiao-lin WANG Bin |
| |
| Abstract: | This article points out three problems in applying Most-Favored-Nation Treatment by analyzing Canada-Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry. The first problem is about explaining "unconditionally" in Article I of GATT 1994. The second problem is whether Article I of GATT 1994 involves both legal discrimination and factual discrimination. The third problem is whether Canada-Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry could be exempted by Article 24 of GATT 1994. This article draws the conclusion that it is not interpretation of principles but interpretation of a certain concept that is placed emphasis on under the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO. This article also gives enlightening guidance for China to deal with how to apply Most-Favored-Nation Treatment. |
| |
| Keywords: | Most-Favored-Nation Treatment unconditionally discrimination Customs Unions and Free-TradeAreas enlightenment |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
